_Laurie_ Posted December 11, 2006 Report Posted December 11, 2006 I loved Rocky I and II, the others were okay, except the last one I didn't care for at all....I'll probably would be curious to see the new one I guess...
invisible_r Posted December 11, 2006 Report Posted December 11, 2006 this is really bugging me. can anyone figure it out?
The Seeker Posted December 11, 2006 Report Posted December 11, 2006 I got Star Wars and the Matrix. I was absolutely convinced that High Noon was featured there too, but it wasn't.
PSYCHOcatholic Posted December 11, 2006 Author Report Posted December 11, 2006 How The West Was Won pt. 50
TheTallOne Posted December 11, 2006 Report Posted December 11, 2006 The Lone Ranger, Planet of the Apes
invisible_r Posted December 12, 2006 Report Posted December 12, 2006 I got Star Wars and the Matrix. same here. I was convinced that zorro was there but it won't accept it. only ten to go, correct answers so far star wars, the matrix, kung fu, planet of the apes and the lone ranger.
Kevin Posted December 12, 2006 Report Posted December 12, 2006 Invisible : stuff like this is exactly why one should view MySpace as evil and hold the entire internet in great suspicion; some chumps have made their own movie and are promoting it in this way ?! Don't play their game . The 'prize' is... what ... ?!?!
invisible_r Posted December 12, 2006 Report Posted December 12, 2006 its a muse competition, i think it's the actual video for "knights of cydonia", and you only win a poster, so I'm not bothered about the prize, I'm just curious
PSYCHOcatholic Posted December 21, 2006 Author Report Posted December 21, 2006 K...im watching Tommy The Rock Opera from the Who. I dont get it... Question...Is Jack Nicholson SINGING?!
TheLizard Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 Yes, that's Nicholson's voice. Originally they planned to have someone else sing voiceover, but Nicholson started to sing, and they realized he didn't have such a bad voice.
PSYCHOcatholic Posted December 21, 2006 Author Report Posted December 21, 2006 Wow...Eric Clapton, Tina Turner, not to mention Anne Margaret. Awesome Cast, great movie... CONFUSING AS HELL! I thought originally Tommy's Father returns home and kills the lover, but in the movie its all twisted around and yeah, im confused. Is he like a symbol of Jesus?
TheLizard Posted December 21, 2006 Report Posted December 21, 2006 Tommy's father returns home, and the lover kills him. Basically the album and the movie are Pete's attack on organized religion. Tommy is the "messiah", but when he tries to make the world listen to him, it backfires. Then at the end goes off on his own, and "hears the music". Yeah, it's really far-fetched, but the music and the cast are great, and it's worth a viewing. I found it to be more enjoyable the second time, just because I knew what to expect. Definitely a rock and roll classic, but very strange.
TheLizard Posted December 24, 2006 Report Posted December 24, 2006 I can't believe I'm saying this, but the Transformers movie looks kind of cool. Does anyone else remember playing with those? I would always break mine trying to make them turn into something they weren't meant to be.
PSYCHOcatholic Posted December 28, 2006 Author Report Posted December 28, 2006 I finally got the 25th anniversary edition of Pink Floyd's The Wall. Freakin great! I finally got to see the outtake of "Hey You" I dont know why they didnt keep it in, the movie would have only been a few minutes longer with it. They coulda kept "The Show Must Go On" in it as well, hell, if Peter Jackson can do a three hour movie about midgets wizards and elves and keep us entertained. Pink Floyd could have done it. BTW, The Making of The Wall, is really cool. I enjoyed it alot, and theres lots of information on it. Lots of cool extras. I reccomend getting it if you havent already.
Lexxi Marie Posted December 30, 2006 Report Posted December 30, 2006 The Sting is one of my favorite films of all time. However there's a goof haha.. when it was set in, '37... (they made it in '71), they were still usin' letters for horses back then, they changed it in the late 60's/early 70's to numbers. In the movie they're using numbers. Ha, go figure.
Red Fish Posted December 30, 2006 Report Posted December 30, 2006 They branded horses with letters instead of numbers back then? How awful!
edna Posted December 30, 2006 Report Posted December 30, 2006 The Sting is one of my favorite films of all time. However there's a goof haha.. when it was set in, '37... (they made it in '71), they were still usin' letters for horses back then, they changed it in the late 60's/early 70's to numbers. In the movie they're using numbers. Ha, go figure. That´s funny, I didn´t know that... it´s one of my favorite films too, I love to watch it every now and then.
Lexxi Marie Posted December 31, 2006 Report Posted December 31, 2006 Ah yeah me too, what a beautiful con...what a beautiful buzz And no they didn't brand them
bazooka Posted December 31, 2006 Report Posted December 31, 2006 ... they were still usin' letters for horses back then, they changed it in the late 60's/early 70's to numbers. In the movie they're using numbers. Ha, go figure. Do you mean to denote a race horse's post position? You've really confused me. If that was changed, I'm pretty sure it must have happened earlier than the late 60s.
Lexxi Marie Posted December 31, 2006 Report Posted December 31, 2006 ^ No. I mean like today and since the late 60s/early 70s instead of using post positions 12345678910etc, they used letters, as in post posistion ABCDEFGHIJK...etc.
bazooka Posted January 3, 2007 Report Posted January 3, 2007 Still confused. How do you know that? Seabiscuit 1940
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now