Jump to content

Michael Jackson Verdict


_jr_
 Share

Recommended Posts

What a pointless, media-lead, moneygrabbing load of old t*ss! The man may be as mad as a box of frogs, and he may have done some things abhorent to the rest of us - nobody could ever know the truth with all the rubbish surrounding this trial. Its everything that is wrong with society today all neatly wrapped in a media-friendly parcel and served to a salivating equally mad public. The 'supporters' outside the court are clearly as barking as the man himself.

Bring back Rumpole of the Bailey.....

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Per- jury ... is such an ugly word .... everything they said -- untrue ."

" You never gave us your mon- ey , and now you got a little vin-di-cation ...'cause in the middle of investigation ... we broke down ."

Who cares !?! It's over , thank God !!

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :drummer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the last few weeks I felt MJ would get off. Regardless of if there was a crime or wasn't the jury came back with the only decision they could bring forth with the evidence presented to them.

As many of us know, when on a jury if there is even the slightest doubt in a juror's mind they can not convict as guilty. This case had all the markings of doubt. Tom Sneddon acted on the poor credibility of the victim's mother and brought forth a case. He confiscated all computers at Neverland which in the end showed no evidence at all of child porn. The magazines he presented as evidence were all legal. The mother hit on other celebrities prior to getting to MJ. She had claims against JC Penney for being roughed up by security guards after most thought the marks on her were created by her abusive ex-husband. She collected a nice sum of money and never reported it to welfare when she signed up making her a cheat. The boys recanted their original confession and then under cross examination screwed up their stories. Sneddon also brought in previous young friends who for the most part testified on behalf of MJ. I even read earlier today that on the week the mother claimed they were being held captive at Neverland, the truth was she got a full body wax and her kids got orthodonture work, all paid for by MJ. All of this and more made the prosecution team at best weak in their case.

I have always thought Michael to be somewhat off the wall when it came to youngsters, especially boys. There was probably some truth to the previous two cases he was involved in as well as this case but the jury was left helpless and with the case presented to them by the prosecution they could not convict. Though the results may have been not what many thought should have been, you have to admit the justice and jury system in this case did prevail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such is the media b*llocks surrounding this circus that if the bloke was actually innocent, nobody will trust him again. If he is just a child himself and no danger to others of his mental level, he will only be trusted with the children of 'chancers' from now on, irrespective of the truth.

What should be on trial now is the American media, and all those people connected to the case. The world should sue them all for gross timewasting, self-importance and having too much time on their hands in a world where everything else is more important. A space-alien looking down on earth would doubtlessly conclude from this that the human race cannot manage its time and resources, and deserves extinction by disappearing up its own collective 21st century ars*hole. It makes me seeth, as you may have guessed!

Oh, he wouldn't be my first choice of babysitter either.

Regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Such is the media b*llocks surrounding this circus that if the bloke was actually innocent, nobody will trust him again. If he is just a child himself and no danger to others of his mental level, he will only be trusted with the children of 'chancers' from now on, irrespective of the truth.

That's right, innocent or guilty, mud sticks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not likely , PF1973, as an innocent on all counts verdict is unlikely to produce any cash in a civil suit ... and do they have the money/credibility for decent lawyers , again ? They'll be lucky just not to be exposed in the press , and have to find more comfortable Diggs ( pardon the pun ;) ) .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did someone forget about the OJ civil suit? :doh:

:afro: :afro: :afro: :jester: :jester:

-what I'm saying... lottery time in the courtroom.

Less evidents and persuasion is needed in a civil case, besides, don't you think he has anything better to do with his time that go to court if he can buy out of it.

I want him to cough up those Beatles songs! I want to see Neverland be never more. He needs to go to the hospital and stay there, he needs to be watched. Maybe he didn't do anything "illegal" but his lifestyle and actions are a ticking time bomb at the very least.

This verdict probably gives him more confidence that he can not be held accountable. I say he is more dangerous than ever. Keep him away from the kids. It's not healthy!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has any one heard what he was comparing his acquittal to on his site? He compared it to the Birth of Martin Luther King Jr. and the taking down of the Berlin wall. Man, there is one major difference, though. More people are mad about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...