AliceNchains Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 This should interesting. Lennon is God thats all I have to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCyberdemon Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 McCartney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 oh, come on, sweetCD, John Lennon IS god...and PaulMcCartney only makes muzak since the split... and money... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danielj Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 lennon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCyberdemon Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Maybe so, but I hated The Beatles, and Lennons is a dirty commie bastard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasyRider Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 John Lennon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXX Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Paul followed by George Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jugband_Blues Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Maybe so, but I hated The Beatles, and Lennons is a dirty commie bastard. WTF!? i quote john lennon, "i don't believe in 'ism's' i only believe in me" that would mean that he's not a communist, he's a musical genius. yet mccarteny's close behind though and dude, youre a dumbass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Lennon, then Harrison. McCartney only turned out crap, both with and after the Beatles (okay, maybe a couple Beatles tunes, but that's all I'll give him) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Annabelle_ Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Going against the general consensus, my vote goes for Paul. John was cool but, I dunno, I've always liked McCartney more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MindCrime Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 John Lennon Is there something missing? Where's the poll at? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoulGirl Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Maybe so, but I hated The Beatles, and Lennons is a dirty commie bastard. lennon gets my vote but paul gets a special mention for wonderful christmas time - *ahem* have always been quite fond of george actually despite enjoying weird al yankovic's 'this song is just six words long' send-up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danielj Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCyberdemon Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 WTF!? i quote john lennon, "i don't believe in 'ism's' i only believe in me" that would mean that he's not a communist, he's a musical genius. yet mccarteny's close behind though and dude, youre a dumbass Spenca, Please learn how to speak our language before you even think of stepping on this, ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpride09 Posted October 20, 2004 Report Share Posted October 20, 2004 CD-you suck communist?? jez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XXX Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 i quote john lennon, "i don't believe in 'ism's' i only believe in me" that would mean that he's not a communist, he's a musical genius. No, that would make him a believer in Egoism. I quote the egotistical bastard: We're bigger than Hey-sus... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jugband_Blues Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 cyberdemon, i apologize, i just dont know where you communism from john lennon. i think we both might've mispoken a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCyberdemon Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 think we both might've mispoken a little. Another thing. I never mispeak. I said it, I stand by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jugband_Blues Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 whatever, im just trying to maintain the peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheCyberdemon Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 I understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MuzikTyme Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 George Harrison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted October 21, 2004 Report Share Posted October 21, 2004 John Lennon was violent, impulsive and also very snob, he loved to "épater le bourgeois", like they say in french. Yet he was aware of all his bad habits and was always fighting within himself and against himself to be a right guy. I think his good side is so huge that we can forget that he was maybe a commie for a while, a commie living in the Dakota and riding in limousines... (or so he said when it was trendy to be so), or even a supporter of the Black panthers and other things like that. And he was a genius. And thank you, John Lennon, you were my english teacher! You´ve sweetened my early days!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy1104 Posted October 24, 2004 Report Share Posted October 24, 2004 This "John Lennon is a commie" thing in this thread is based on what facts? I have to believe by the words he wrote that he wouldn't adapt well to communism. Communism can be an oppresive ideology of government when done in the way the old Russia ran their government. That would put a limit on freedoms that we enjoy here in the United States. Lennon was a freedom and peace guy. I do not believe his thoughts would have been allowed to be expressed in Russia. Also, I have never read that Lennon was ever involved with any communist or socialistic groups or regimes. As for his comments on the Beatles being bigger than Jesus, when he made that statement it was quickly taken out of context. He was not putting himself and the band above Jesus as far as religious reverence is concerned. When he made that comment he meant that more kids are listening to the Beatles than reading their bibles or going to Sunday school, etc. I do agree though it was an egoistic statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted October 24, 2004 Report Share Posted October 24, 2004 This "John Lennon is a commie" thing in this thread is based on what facts? John Lennon wasn´t a commie. He was supporting the black panthers in the first seventies while he made meetings for peace... he was contradictory, that´s part of his genius. He had trouble with the Nixon administration due to his political statements and they wouldn´t give him the Green Card, pretending he had had some drug problems (law problems) in the UK. That´s all. He never was a commie, he was John Lennon, take it or leave it. I take him!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted October 24, 2004 Report Share Posted October 24, 2004 Anyway, commie or not... who cares??? We´re not talking about Fidel Castro or Stalin... everybody pretended to be a commie by that time in the artistic scene... "comie" means nothing in this case, "Beatles" means a lot...ouf!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now