_jr_ Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 I was thinking about this on the way to work this morning, and thought it might generate some discussion. I was listening to Aerosmith's 'Get Your Wings' cd, (their best, IMO), and it occured to me that, during their 30+ years, Aerosmith has been two different bands. For us older generation, the first 5-6 albums are Aerosmith. Rocks, Draw The Line, Toys in the Attic, etc. That's what we grew up with. It was gritty, raunchy, flat out mean. Then, Aerosmith went through some personel changes, got sober, got back together, and re-emerged as a completely different band. Gone was 'Big Ten Inch Record, Seasons of Wither, Lick and A Promise, Uncle Salty, and Movin' Out' In was 'Livin' on the Edge, Amazing, Love in an Elevator, Crazy, and Cryin' They're ok songs, I guess, but not what I was used to from the Bad Boys from Beantown. so anyway, it dawned on me, that the reason all that newer stuff was so popular, is because Aerosmith tapped into the next generation. The MTVers. All the old school fans were shut out, but they was a whole new generation of 14-19 year olds that dug their stuff. It wasn't nearly as crunchy and dirty and insolent as Aerosmith's first time around, but it was what the next generation got, and they bought it. So, in essence, I guess, Aerosmith had two 'primes'. Are there any other bands you can think of like that? Bands that changed, but captured a new audience with their new sound? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 Chicago, for the worse. Doobie Brothers, for the worse. Van Halen, for the worse. Damn you, Cetera, McDonald and Hagar. Damn you to hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisible_r Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 (edited) I think New Order tried with "crystal" a couple of years ago, but i'm not sure it was that succesful. same with duran duran and the album they released this year. Although the time-span is not similar, greenday have done the same. They were at their first peak with "dookie" when i was a teenager about 10 years ago, and now "american idiot" which introduces them to my sister's generation note the comment she made ( i think i have mentioned this before) when i told her i liked greenday when i was her age "what? they are that old?" Edited November 11, 2005 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Jane 61 Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 Jefferson Airplane...who went to Jefferson Starship...then Starship...ahhhh...there is only one Jefferson Airplane!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_jr_ Posted November 11, 2005 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 That's exactly my point. They were immensely popular....to a completely different audience. The old schoolers like us think, "Wow, what is that?? That's not what I grew up with!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Laurie_ Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 Chicago, for the worse. Doobie Brothers, for the worse. Van Halen, for the worse. Damn you, Cetera, McDonald and Hagar. Damn you to hell. Das, those are exactly the same bands I thought of! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 The old schoolers like us think, "Wow, what is that?? That's not what I grew up with!" See, I'm kind of backwards. The versions of these groups I grew up with were the crappy "newer" ones. Except for Van Halen, but Sammy Hagar just plain sucks. Luckily I found the earlier versions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 Jefferson Airplane...who went to Jefferson Starship...then Starship...ahhhh...there is only one Jefferson Airplane!! How could I forget them? I still can't fathom how the same band who did "White Rabbit" also did "We Built This City". Well, I guess they weren't really the same band anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisible_r Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 if that is a valid example, then another case is joy division and new order. the sound is quite different. not exactly the same band though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 How could I forget them? I still can't fathom how the same band who did "White Rabbit" also did "We Built This City". Well, I guess they weren't really the same band anymore. Jefferson Airplane had an evolution similar to other bands... they maybe went more poppish in some ways (Marty Balin reminds me of Steve Winwood in their evolutions too) but they also enhanced their sound with Pappa John Creach or Craig Chaquico... they went more heavy or psychedelic and less "avant-garde". the members of the band changed constantly, leaving and coming back, etc... Well, I´m a JA/JS fan and I love most of what they do anyways... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 if that is a valid example, then another case is joy division and new order. the sound is quite different. not exactly the same band though I think that after Ian Curtis´suicide the band became less depressive... in any case they always choose some weird names... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Some of those bands were merely guilty of going from making music (art) to making money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 Some of those bands were merely guilty of going from making music (art) to making money. You´re right. In the case of Slick, Kantner, Balin, they loved to be superstars and have a public private life... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invisible_r Posted November 12, 2005 Report Share Posted November 12, 2005 what about blondie? they made a brief comeback with "no exit" (the one that has "maria") which introduced them to my generation, a few years ago. "maria" was very mainstream, so I don't know how it compares to their early stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesboy Posted November 13, 2005 Report Share Posted November 13, 2005 What an uproar in the mid '60s when Dylan went electric and freaked out the folk purists. Fleetwood Mac was blues from '68 - '70 and fluff after that. and the Beatles had two different phases with before and after Sgt. Pepper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otokichi Posted December 5, 2005 Report Share Posted December 5, 2005 Bands, singer-songwriters, and performers change over time, if they don't stare down the barrel of a shotgun, crash in small airplanes, overdose on drugs, or convert to Islam. (Sorry Stephen Giorgiou, I preferred "Cat Stevens.") A local singer-singwriter commented on an early morning news show that he didn't want to do material from 30 years ago forever. (This was Gerald Santos, half of "Olomana," a close haromony duo who came to prominence during the 1970's "Hawaiian music renaissance.") Elvis Presley went this way, then that, ssettling on the "Las Vegas Elvis" after ditching the 1968 "Comeback Elvis," and becoming a parody of himself. Fleetwood Mac was a Blues band before personnel changes took them on Pop road to gold and fame. Then there's Antonio Benedetto, who appeals to young and old alike; remember "Tony Bennett: Unplugged"? If an artist can span the generations without a big head or doing Heavy Metal covers, that's fine with me. (Pat Boone, what were you thinking about?) Change is interesting, no matter what the old fans say/think. (I wonder if that 100 year-old my sister's group this month is honoring likes Rap?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heard It On The XM Posted December 20, 2005 Report Share Posted December 20, 2005 Genesis is another example of a rock group reinventing itself (for better or worse) in the middle of its long career. In their early years with Peter Gabriel on lead vocals, Genesis was a progressive/English-folk rock band in roughly the same vein as Jethro Tull (and like Tull's lead singer Ian Anderson, Gabriel even played the flute). After he left in 1975 and drummer Phil Collins took over the lead vocals, Genesis began to slowly metamorphosize into what could best be described as progressive power pop - a process accelerated by the departure of guitarist Steve Hackett, and which was more or less complete by the end of that decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLD 55 Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 What an uproar in the mid '60s when Dylan went electric and freaked out the folk purists. Fleetwood Mac was blues from '68 - '70 and fluff after that. and the Beatles had two different phases with before and after Sgt. Pepper Very incisive John - except for Fleetwood Lack. My son-in-law has all their old blues stuff. (I have "Albatross" and "Man Of The World"). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesboy Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 except for Fleetwood Lack. My son-in-law has all their old blues stuff. (I have "Albatross" and "Man Of The World"). I enjoyed some of their later songs, but I liked their first few blues albums more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OLD 55 Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 You and my son-in-law would get along famously. I'll have to see if I can get him to join Songfacts. I like what you said about the Beatles. I've always thought they had two distinct eras; the early "innocent" one(for want of a better word) and the "LSD" one which commenced with Sgt. Pepper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 A local singer-singwriter commented on an early morning news show that he didn't want to do material from 30 years ago forever. Change is interesting, no matter what the old fans say/think. You made me think of Jagger's famous/infamous quote ~ '69 , that he " didn't want to be singing 'Satisfaction' in 25 years or so ..." . Biggest grossing tour ever this year - and you know that it's mostly oldies , at least that's what the crowds want . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted December 31, 2005 Report Share Posted December 31, 2005 Fleetwood Mac was blues from '68 - '70 and fluff after that. That´s because Peter Green left in 1970. He was the bluesy one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batman Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 First there was "Close to the Edge" Yes, then there was "Owner of a Lonely Heart" Yes...ugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shawna Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 I just commented to Brad the other night that I wonder if Sir Paul still sings "When I'm 64", now that he's at least that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted January 1, 2006 Report Share Posted January 1, 2006 He´ll be 64 next June... and I´m certain he´ll do something about that... an album, a song, a tour... or just a new remastered Sgt Peppers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now