daslied Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 By that logic, no, there is no time unaccounted for. But your math is a little off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted June 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Damned riddles. Someone had better figure this out quickly, because it will drive me crazy if it sits here over the weekend while das isn't here. } Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 You have about 30 minutes until I'm gone, so get crackin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted June 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 I demand a hint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted June 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 We worked until noon when we ate lunch, which lasted an hour. I- It's got something to do with this, because the Chief interrupted him. Something to do with the word usage. I don't think he took his lunch from 12 to 1, but I can't tell you why I think that. Damn. } Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 It takes a minute to cut a slab, and he has to make 179. How many minutes does that take? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted June 30, 2006 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Wait a minute. Cutting the slab and making the piece are two different things. So if he cuts a slab in two, he's making two pieces out of it. So it wouldn't necessarily take 179 minutes to make 179 pieces. Or something like that. I hate you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 86 minutes? Each time you cut one you have 2 pieces? Ahhh. I'm thnking out loud. On screen, whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted July 2, 2006 Report Share Posted July 2, 2006 Did he perchance have two minutes leftover? Maybe 179 pieces took him 178 minutes which would have him finishing work at 3:58. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 Radhi is correct, because she's insanely smart. You only make 178 cuts; the 178th cut still leaves you with an extra piece, which is #179. He had two minutes to do the thieving. Peaches, you were almost there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted July 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 I had forgotten about how frustrated I was by this whole thing. I'm mad all over again, damn it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MindCrime Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 I had forgotten about how frustrated I was by this whole thing. I'm mad all over again, damn it. Hey at least your not the one cutting 178 times! over a period of 3 1/2 hours; I'd be insane by that time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 I admit I wouldn't have guessed it if Peaches hadn't mentioned the one cut = 2 pieces thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 This is one of my favourites. I love the logic behind the solution. Perhaps you know it. You are a contestant on the game show Let's Make a Deal, and emcee Monty Hall has a game for you to play. On stage are three huge doors, and he informs you that hidden behind one of the three doors is a brand new sports car, behind another is a donkey, and behind another is 400 pounds of bananas. (This may seem obvious, but your goal is to get the car, not the donkey or the bananas.) He asks you to choose one door, and you will win the prize behind that door. You choose, but before he reveals what you have won, Monty reveals what's behind one of the doors you did not pick, and it's not the car. Before revealing what lies behind the remaining two doors, he makes you one final offer: if you wish, you may switch from your choice to the other remaining door. The question is: Should you switch, should you not switch, or does it matter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MindCrime Posted July 4, 2006 Report Share Posted July 4, 2006 It wouldn't matter, the odds are still the same. You now have a 1/2 chance of getting the car, instead of 33% like before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 That is the common misconception... if you use the laws of probability you will see there is a beautiful logic behind the whole thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted July 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Ooooh, I love beautiful logic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Okay, say you picked the door stage right. Monty opens the center door to reveal the donkey. But the donkey is turned to stage right and chewing on bananas. You should switch your choice to the stage left door, because you now know that the donkey is in the center and the bananas are behind your original choice, the stage right door. Sure, that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Peaches Posted July 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Sure, that's the ticket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 There's a ticket? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MindCrime Posted July 5, 2006 Report Share Posted July 5, 2006 Sorry Joe, you're all outta luck. Some scalper got in before anybody else & is hawking them off in the songfacts parking lot for 3 times the venue price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted July 6, 2006 Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 Das, you must be correct in some alternate dimension. Now since I love this riddle so much, I'm putting up the answer now: You should switch. If contestants switch every time, one of two things happens: (a) With probability 2/3, the contestant picks a wrong door. Monty Hall shows the prize behind the other wrong door, and the contestant switches to the door hiding the car. ( With probability 1/3, the contestant picks the right door, Monty Hall reveals either the donkey or the bananas, and the contestant switches to the other "zonk" prize. So, with probability 2/3, the "switch" strategy will elicit the car. This is one of the most famous (and widely-debated) probability problems of the past ten years. For more information, and a simulation to show that the above solution is truly correct, check out the following website: http://www.cut-the-knot.org/hall.shtml The site gives a further explanation... I was utterly fascinated by the logic when I first learnt of this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted July 6, 2006 Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 The gist of the whole thing is that chances are in favour of the door you DIDN'T select having the car. So once the host has opened a door with the donkey/bananas... probability suggests that the remaining door is the one with the car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Joe Posted July 6, 2006 Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 Rad-ji, with all due respect I must simply say, Booshwah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daslied Posted July 6, 2006 Report Share Posted July 6, 2006 Das, you must be correct in some alternate dimension. Awesome, I was right! I am the smartest person alive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now