elie Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 i say ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 You do, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Shh...she's thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Good. It´s good. It´s not bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blind-fitter Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 She has her "Posts" and "Age" numbers juxtaposed, perchance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I think she's a he Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 You're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Is this what we're supposed to be discussing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blind-fitter Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 By Jove, Levis, I think you may have got something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Alright then.....having a lot of albums is a good thing. I discussed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I want a clarification here. Who is doing the 'having'? Us or the album makers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 ah, but what if you have a lot of Boy-Band albums... still a good thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I want a clarification here. Who is doing the 'having'? Us or the album makers? and what is "a lot of"? 5? 10? 3542? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Well I'd say it's a good thing if an album makers has a lot of albums (as long as they're not really bad, of course) and it's a good thing if we have a lot of albums. It's all about quality, though, thanks Farin. Please define "boy band". Are the Beatles a boy band? The Who? The Rolling Stones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 And something else...we should differentiate between original albums and burned copies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 Please define "boy band". Are the Beatles a boy band? The Who? The Rolling Stones? I was talking of course of commercially "created" / "invented" boygroups, when all aspects (the image of the group, the songs and TV show appearances) are controlled by managers something like Take That, N'Sync, New Kids on the Block or the Monkees Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I think "a lot of" is much better than "very little". It aplies to records, money, luck, and some other things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 I was talking of course of commercially "created" / "invented" boygroups, when all aspects (the image of the group, the songs and TV show appearances) are controlled by managers something like Take That, N'Sync, New Kids on the Block or the Monkees I know. But at least the Monkees make good music. That's what I think, in any case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 But at least the Monkees make good music. That's what I think, in any case. they made music? didn't I read somewhere that the producers wouldn't ALLOW them to play instruments in the studio recordings? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Seeker Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 The Monkees sang well, their songwriters wrote good music, their session musicians played well. So there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Levis Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 It's not a very eloquently framed question... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edna Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 But look, in an hour or so we have already 3 pages... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 The Monkees sang well, their songwriters wrote good music, their session musicians played well. So there. that's better... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_s_1987 Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 No comment on the unusual "Music News" placement of this topic? I guess someone will move it soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farin Posted November 25, 2006 Report Share Posted November 25, 2006 No comment on the unusual "Music News" placement of this topic? I guess someone will move it soon. I wanted to, but forgot about it... thanks for bringing that up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now