Sweet Jane 61 Posted November 15, 2007 Report Share Posted November 15, 2007 Why? Makes no sense with all the beautiful talented women in Hollywood.... Check out the article why she is a bad choice...LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJonSurfer Posted November 15, 2007 Report Share Posted November 15, 2007 I'm not sure talent is factored heavily into Maxim's Woman of the Year competition...however, there are many actresses that have a better body of work (recently) than Sarah. BTW, she ain't bad lookin' but she isn't what I would expect on the cover of Maxim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue_n_white Posted November 15, 2007 Report Share Posted November 15, 2007 Well she is Buffy the Vampire Slayer. That has to count for somethin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJonSurfer Posted November 16, 2007 Report Share Posted November 16, 2007 She "was" Buffy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue_n_white Posted November 16, 2007 Report Share Posted November 16, 2007 She will always be Buffy to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blind-fitter Posted November 16, 2007 Report Share Posted November 16, 2007 What are the entry criteria for this award? I can't see what the problem is: I mean, she looks pretty hot to me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonJonSurfer Posted November 16, 2007 Report Share Posted November 16, 2007 I decided to Google "Maxim's Woman of the Year" to find out about the criteria. What amused me about the search was that my comment above was the number ten listed "hit" on the subject. Never found the criteria, but she is cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now